148404 stories
·
0 followers

New Evidence of Alleged FBI Malfeasance Emerges in Sex Cult Founder's Case

1 Share

New evidence has emerged that allegedly shows the FBI manufactured and planted evidence to secure the conviction of NXIVM sex cult founder Keith Raniere, according to the latest appeal for his release.

Raniere was convicted in October 2020 of racketeering, sex trafficking, forced labor conspiracy, and wire fraud conspiracy and was sentenced to 120 years in prison. He was also fined $1.75 million.

If the FBI were shown to have acted improperly, it could have implications beyond the case if Congress investigates, as well being a blow to public trust in an agency that is already expected to face a major shake-up after Donald Trump takes office early next year.

Evidence of government malfeasance, provided in the appeal documents, included more than 100 photos planted across a digital camera memory card and backup hard drive, according to court documents filed in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Oct. 28 as part of an appeal seeking a new trial. Evidence also included property search records that contained anomalies and improprieties – revealing a staged crime scene, according to court records filed in the Eastern District of New York on Nov. 28 as part of a motion to vacate the original sentence.

"The search of 8 Hale (a property where Raniere had resided) was deliberately and fraudulently staged and that search scene collection photographs were also deliberately staged," wrote Mark Daniel Bowling, a former FBI agent and former agent for the Department of Energy's Office of Inspector General, one of the experts hired by Raniere's legal team.

"Further, I agree that at least four of the nine search team members were complicit in this fraudulent conduct, with two of them as key orchestrators," he added. "During my nearly 20 years in the FBI, I have never seen a search executed with this level of corrupt and illegal behavior," added Bowling referring to the search on March 27, 2018.

The FBI declined comment to Newsweek on the case.

Raniere's legal team has hired seven digital forensic experts, four of whom are former FBI examiners, and a former FBI crime scene and senior evidence technician photographer for the new appeal.

How was Raniere Convicted?

Raniere founded NXIVM as what he called a self-help group in the 1990s and was accused of creating a sex cult known as DOS within the organization. Its female members said they served as "slaves" and "masters." Multiple women testified that they joined DOS after being told it was a "women's empowerment" group. They said they later discovered they would be expected to have sex with Raniere, send him nude photos and have his initials branded onto their bodies.

One piece of evidence was an alleged late discovery, 11 months after the search was conducted, by agents of more than a dozen images of a female that the FBI said was a minor, based on the photo's metadata showing it was taken in 2005, when the female was under age 18. The woman, with the pseudonym Camila, said in a victim impact statement she had a sexual relationship with Raniere.

Within a few weeks of when the photo evidence and child pornography charges were filed, Raniere's five codefendants all took plea deals, making it harder for his defense to argue for his innocence.

What are the Allegations of Malfeasance?

However, the experts now hired by the defense say in a report that the photo metadata had been changed to make it appear that Camila was under 18 when the pictures were taken, while Raniere's lawyers say she was a legal adult when a relationship began.

Raniere's lawyers previously filed a motion for a new trial alleging malfeasance by the FBI on the grounds of the allegedly manufactured photo evidence, which was rejected in April by Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the Eastern District of New York. They filed a new appeal on that case in October.

In its own filing responding to the defense's motion for a hearing on a new trial the government admitted that an unidentified FBI photo technician had accessed critical and unpreserved evidence, which the defense's experts say was an unprecedented act that taints the evidence.

"If he's not a digital forensic examiner, why is he taking a piece of digital forensic evidence and plugging it into his machine?" asked Micah Sturgis, an independent forensics expert and owner of Sturgis Forensics LLC, who reviewed the reports by the seven forensic experts for Newsweek but is not involved in the case. He reviewed the initial and subsequent reports by the former FBI experts for the initial motion for a new trial, and the government's own filing in response to the motion for a new trial which was denied and is now pending appeal.

"I'm sure that violates the FBI policy," Sturgis added. "That would definitely violate any type of local law enforcement policy ... It appears to me that the FBI has altered the images, or they have changed the evidence to fit their narrative."

Sturgis worked as a digital forensic expert for law enforcement for 10 years and was trained by the U.S. Secret Service at the National Computer Forensic Institute. He said he was limited in his assessment because he didn't have access to the original evidence, but he knows the agents who drafted the defense's reports personally and by reputation and he believes them.

Sturgis said he was surprised that the judge didn't give more credence to the report by the former FBI agents as part of the motion for a new trial and alongside the new search findings, in the motion to vacate the original sentence.

"When you've got that and it's being shoved in your face by seven experts, and a judge turns his nose up at it, that entire judicial system needs to be brought into question," he said.

What Happened in the Search?

Kenneth DeNardo, a 23-year veteran of the FBI who worked as a senior evidence technician and photographer for the evidence response team and is now among the experts paid by Raniere's defense said he has "never seen a search with this magnitude of malfeasance."

He alleged that FBI agents had pre-filled the list of personnel on the scene and one agent signed off as several other agents, against agency protocol. He also said that an agent pre-filled the evidence recovery log for the search at 8 Hale before even arriving to conduct the search. FBI protocol requires evidence logs be filled out on site to ensure an accurate real-time record of the search, but this didn't happen at 8 Hale.

"This is evidenced by crossed-out entries on a later page of the log that correspond to items already listed on an earlier page, albeit in a different sequence, revealing a pre-choreographed effort to fit a predetermined narrative rather than the required real-time documentation. This constitutes evidence fabrication," he wrote.

He cites multiple other problems with the search, including the fact that a dog was apparently present (a paw was photographed at the scene), despite never being logged as part of the search. Such oversights are serious violations of protocol that indicate an overall pattern of inaccuracy and falsification, DeNardo said.

He said it appears that FBI agents "choreographed" finding key evidence in an upstairs room right away, instead of starting the search with the first room downstairs, per standard FBI procedure. DeNardo said that agents manufactured a scene on a bookshelf by adding and arranging items including two uncollected books on sex trafficking. DeNardo said he also believes one camera was planted on the scene because it was staged on a countertop and photographed, but never taken into evidence.

Another camera, the one allegedly used to take photos of Camila, was discovered almost a year after the search and has an unknown origin, because it was not clearly visible in any FBI photograph taken on the property, according to DeNardo's report.

The Digital Evidence

The latest court filings also go into more detail outlining what it said were major problems with the digital material that the FBI said it had found within law enforcement's evidence 11 months after the search of the Hale property.

The case against Raniere was built on two key pieces of digital evidence: a camera card and an external hard drive, said J. Richard Kiper, a retired FBI special agent and computer forensic examiner and instructor who produced a report for the defense on the digital forensic evidence.

Prosecutors said that Raniere used the camera and its card to take explicit photographs of women, including of Camile when she was allegedly 15.

But Kiper and the other experts say the camera card was likely altered between April 11, 2019, and June 11, 2019, while in FBI custody.

According to FBI practice, no examination of electronic evidence can take place before a forensic image (exact copy) has been made of the device by the CART (Computer Analysis Response Team) lab. However, on September 19, 2019, an FBI examiner took the camera card out of evidence control for "review" before CART had processed the evidence, according to court documents. This is a major violation of chain-of-custody standards, Kiper said.

On the same day the camera card was accessed without a write-blocker, which meant it could have been manipulated, the experts said.

"Them taking an SD card that's in question, and that's important evidence, and plugging it into a computer that's not write-blocked – that right there is enough, in my opinion, to have tainted everything. If they allow that to happen there, what more have they done?" Sturgis said.

Kiper said that's because there was no write-blocker, it could not be determined what was originally on that memory card.

What's Next?

The FBI has until March 2025 to respond to the filing from Raniere's legal team.

In the meantime, Sturgis says this evidence could have ramifications far beyond Raniere's case, particularly if Congress decides to step in and examine the allegations.

"If the FBI manufactured evidence in this case, then the American people need to be concerned with their freedoms and what can happen to them if they're being investigated by the FBI," he said. "At what point do you lose complete trust in our federal government or our state government or even our local government?"

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), the chair of the subcommittee on federal courts, oversight, agency action, and federal rights, declined to comment on the allegations that the FBI had engaged in major malfeasance.

Read the whole story
· · · · · ·
Michael_Novakhov
3 hours ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

Christopher Wray Is Reportedly Preparing a Nasty Surprise for Donald Trump and Kash Patel

1 Share
Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
8 days ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

Ousted Syrian President Assad granted asylum in Moscow, Russian media says

1 Share
Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
14 days ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

Kyiv issues ultimatum on NATO membership

1 Share

Our readers read next

More from Elena Giordano

Tucker Carlson returns to Russia for interview with Foreign Minister Lavrov

Tucker Carlson returns to Russia for interview with Foreign Minister Lavrov

The former Fox News host also visited Moscow in February for a sit-down with President Vladimir Putin.

Dec 4 2 mins read

South Korean president declares martial law in shock late-night address

South Korean president declares martial law in shock late-night address

President Yoon Suk Yeol said the move was “aimed at eradicating pro-North Korean forces.”

Dec 3 2 mins read

Finnish telecom company hit by cable outage

Finnish telecom company hit by cable outage

Authorities said the damages were caused by excavation work and there is no suspicion of a criminal offense.

Dec 3 2 mins read

Jordan Bardella threatens to bring down French government over budget

Jordan Bardella threatens to bring down French government over budget

“Barring a last-minute miracle,” the far-right National Rally will vote to topple the prime minister.

Dec 2 3 mins read

Read the whole story
· ·
Michael_Novakhov
16 days ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

Patel knows FBI's dirty secrets

1 Share

OPINION:

Democrats were so committed to the FBI and its cherished Russian dossier in 2017 that they vouched for its author, Christopher Steele, quoted it at hearings and saw it as a sure way to bring down new President Donald Trump.

But then Kash Patel crashed their party.

Mr. Patel, as senior counsel and overseer of spook programs, was a critical figure in then-House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes’ investigation of the FBI’s drive to entrap Mr. Trump in a Russia election conspiracy.

In January 2018, the Republican released the bombshell Nunes memo. It exposed for the first time how the FBI took Mr. Steele’s unreliable gossip and cited it to back up its court affidavits. The FBI corrupted what was supposed to be a fact-based judicial process under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on an American’s communications — in this case, those of Trump volunteer Carter Page.

Worse, Mr. Patel discovered that the senior FBI leaders at the time, James Comey, Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok, never told the court that the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic Party funded and trafficked the dossier.

The Patel-driven Nunes memo brought howls of protest from Democrats and the aligned news media.

But a year later, Department of Justice Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz released his damning report that corroborated Mr. Patel’s work. He concluded that the FBI concealed facts, lied and rigged the affidavits.

Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff tried to counter Nunes-Patel with his own memo. It proved laughably wrong.

If the Senate confirms Mr. Patel’s appointment, he will become the protagonist in a streaming TV original series. The whistleblower who exposed the FBI arrives triumphant as its top cop.

FBI Director Christopher Wray, who will either resign or be fired, never came to grips with what he inherited in August 2017: a scandal-marred front office that needed shaking up. A place that embraced a hoax to bring down a president. Instead, Mr. Wray’s FBI continued to do the Democrats’ bidding by putting parents under surveillance, targeting pro-lifers and whistleblowers and raiding Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home.

In the meantime, FBI agents did the Black Lives Matter kneel in public and put out inaccurate crime statistics.

Mr. Patel’s congressional investigation, over 60 interviews and thousands of pages of documents provided him with a unique view of how the once-august bureau operates.

Mr. Patel’s federal resume includes stints as a Department of Justice prosecutor, senior intelligence and Pentagon official and Trump White House National Security Council staffer.

He told his story in a 2023 book, “Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth and the Battle for Our Democracy,” which displays a dramatic cover photo of Mr. Patel exiting Mr. Trump’s Marine One.

The book begins innocently enough.

“I’m just a guy from Queens and Long Island with the same story as so many others,” he writes. “I didn’t have some special upbringing or education. My parents aren’t rich or famous. They’re just a couple of working-class immigrants from India.”

But he quickly gets to the point.

“The Nunes Memo and [House committee] documents later revealed that the Deep State conducted an unprecedented spying operation against the Trump campaign in an apparent effort to tarnish Trump’s reputation and derail his election,” he writes.

He adds, “The FBI knew about Steele’s bias and that the Clinton campaign and the [Democratic National Committee] had paid for the dossier at the time they submitted their FISA warrant application to spy on Carter Page, but they never told the FISA judge either of these facts, as was required by law.”

As the 2016 election approached, the FBI realized it had nothing to leak after opening the Crossfire Hurricane investigation of Mr. Trump that summer.

“In my opinion,” Mr. Patel writes, “the FBI agents behind Crossfire Hurricane must have been getting nervous as the 2016 campaign came to a close. They launched a FISA warrant based on the Democrat Steele Dossier, sicced an FBI informant on a Trump campaign official, doctored evidence, hid exculpatory information, spied on the Trump campaign, and buttressed their case with drunken tavern talk. Yet despite all that, the FBI’s investigation was coming up with nothing. Nobody in the Trump campaign was found coordinating with the Russians.”

The “drunken tavern talk” refers to Australian diplomat Alexander Downer telling a Department of State official that he shared a drink with Trump volunteer George Papadopoulos, who supposedly said something incriminating about Russia, which he later denied.

This hearsay tidbit was enough for the aforementioned Mr. McCabe, who was then FBI deputy director.

In a list of egregious FBI acts later documented by special counsel John Durham, his report singled out this McCabe gambit as one of the worst.

On July 31, 2016, a momentous date in sordid FBI history, Mr. McCabe ordered Mr. Strzok to open a full investigation of Trump world immediately, the Durham report states. (A week later, Mr. Strzok texted his girlfriend that “we’ll stop” Mr. Trump from becoming president.)

“The matter was opened as a full investigation without ever having spoken to the persons who provided the information,” Mr. Durham said. “Further, the FBI did so without any significant review of its own intelligence databases, collection and examination of any relevant intelligence from other U.S. intelligence entities, interviews of witnesses essential to understand the raw information it had received or using any of the standard analytical tools typically employed by the FBI in evaluating raw intelligence.”

When hearing of Mr. Patel’s nomination, Mr. McCabe rushed to his employer, CNN, to express his disgust at Mr. Trump’s choice, which he described as horrible, unthinkable and conniving.

Stay tuned. 2025 will be a lot like 2017.

• Rowan Scarborough is a columnist with The Washington Times. 

Read the whole story
· · · ·
Michael_Novakhov
17 days ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

New York police investigate bullet casing inscriptions in killing of insurance executive

1 Share

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
18 days ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories
Loading...